International Commercial Mediation and the Development of the Right of Access to Justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/2414-9942.11.2025.185-201

Keywords:

Justice, International Business, Mediation, Development, Interactions

Abstract

Access to justice is a fundamental and constitutional right and concept in most modern legal systems. This right is seen as a safeguard of peace and prosperity in societies through the insurance of the respect of the rule of law and rights by defined structures and institutions. Although the prevailing interpretation of this right is closely linked to the judicial system, there seem to be some developments toward integrating other tools and the emergence of a complex institutional and regulatory justice system. The case of international business disputes appears to be worthy of study as it reflects the specific needs and requirements for customized access to justice in this field. This paper will try to explore this movement and shift in paradigms, focusing on the potential influence of some mechanisms such as mediation, on the classic understanding of access to justice.

Author Biography

Mourad Yousfi, University of Debrecen

PhD Candidate
University of Debrecen, Hungary

References

  1. ADR Center. The Cost of Non ADR – Surveying and Showing the Actual Costs of Intra-Community Commercial Litigation. Report, June 9, 2010. https://toolkitcompany.com/data/files/Resource%20center/Research%20and%20surveys/Survey_Data_Report%20cost%20of%20not%20using%20ADR%20EU%202010.pdf. (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  2. Alexander, Nadja. “Harmonisation and diversity in the private international law of mediation: The rhythms of regulatory reform,” in Mediation: Principles and regulation in comparative perspective, edited by K. J. Hopt and F. Steffek. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://mediation-moves.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Alexander_Harmonisation-and-Diversity-in-the-Private-International-Law-of-Mediation-The-Rhythms-of-Regulatory-Reform.pdf (Last accessed, March 3, 2025)
  3. Alexander, Nadja. “Mediation and the Art of Regulation,” QUT Law & Justice Journal 8, (2008): 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3747674
  4. De Anglin, Delcy Lagones. “Is Over-Regulation Killing Arbitration and Will It Kill Mediation?” In Trade Development through Harmonization of Commercial Law, Hors Série Volume XIX, 239–243. Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, 2015. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/law/research/publications/about-nzacl/publications/special-issues/hors-serie-volume-xvi,-2013/Lagones-de-Anglim.pdf. (Last accessed, March 12, 2025)
  5. De Palo, Giuseppe, Feasley, Ashley, and Orecchini, Flavia. Quantifying the Cost of Not Using Mediation – A Data Analysis. Report, 2011. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201105/20110518ATT19592/20110518ATT19592EN.pdf. (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  6. Esplugues, Carlos. “Civil and Commercial Mediation and National Courts: Towards a New Concept of Justice for the XXI Century?,” in General Reports of the XIXth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Rapports Généraux du XIXème Congrès de l'Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, edited by M. Schauer and B. Verschraegen. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1066-2_10
  7. Faisal Al Shawawreh, Wesam. “An evaluation study in mediation: a comparative study between Australia and Jordan” PhD diss., University of Southern Queensland, 2020. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/39907/1/Wesam%20Faisal%20Al%20Shawawreh-%20PhD%20Final%20thesis.pdf (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  8. Giacalone Marco, and Salehi Sajedeh. “An Empirical Study on Mediation in Civil and Commercial Disputes in Europe: The Mediation Service Providers Perspective,” Revista Ítalo-española De Derecho Procesal, no. 2 (2022): 20-26, https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/802
  9. Fach Gómez, Katia. “The role of mediation in international commercial disputes,” in Mediation in international commercial and investment disputes, edited by C. Titi and K. F. Gómez. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418648
  10. Grosu, Manuela Renata. “Hybrid Procedures: The Combination of Mediation and Arbitration in Resolving Commercial Disputes from Arbitrator, Mediator, Legal Representative, and Client Perspective” PhD diss., Eötvös Loránd University, 2021. https://edit.elte.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10831/54725/Disszert%C3%A1ci%C3%B3.pdf?sequence=1 (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  11. Hietanen-Kunwald, Petra. “Mediation and the legal system: Extracting the legal principles of Civil and Commercial Mediation” PhD diss., Helsinki University, 2018.
  12. https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/4ade2ceb-67fc-4de4-8e9c-4793becc70b9/content (Last accessed, March 6, 2025)
  13. Irvine, Charlie. “What Do ‘Lay’ People Know about Justice? An Empirical Enquiry,” International Journal of Law in Context 16, no. 2 (2020): 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000117.
  14. Matteucci, Giovanni. “The Singapore Convention on Mediation, Challenges and Opportunities.” Seminar Paper, the 2nd KIMC International Seminar, December 3, 2021. https://www.academia.edu/download/88796956/The_Singapore_Convention_on_Mediation_challeng_The_2nd_KIMC_International_Seminar_Seoul_3.12.2021.pdf. (Last accessed, March 30, 2025)
  15. Meidanis, Haris. “Enforcement of Mediation Settlement Agreements in the EU and the Need for Reform,” Journal of Private International Law 16, no. 2 (2020): 275-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2020.1796226
  16. Meidanis, Haris. “International Mediation and Private International Law,” ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin, no. 1 (2020): 41-52.
  17. OECD. Government at a Glance 2021. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en.
  18. Opeskin, Brian. “The Relentless Rise of Judicial Specialisation and its Implications for Judicial Systems,” Current Legal Problems 75, no. 1 (2022): 1-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4185334
  19. P. Hietanen-Kunwald, ‘Mediation and the legal system: Extracting the legal principles of Civil and Commercial Mediation’ (PhD diss., Helsinki University, 2018) https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/4ade2ceb-67fc-4de4-8e9c-4793becc70b9/content (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  20. Qian, Cheng. “The culture of China's mediation in regional and international affairs,” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 28, no. 1 (2010): 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.20012
  21. Reed, Lucy. “International Dispute Resolution Courts: Retreat Or Advance,” McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 4, (2017): 129-147. https://www.canlii.org/w/canlii/2017CanLIIDocs398.pdf (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  22. S. Barona Vilar, C. Esplugues, ‘ADR Mechanisms and Their Incorporation into Global Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Some Concepts and Trends’ in C. Esplugues and S. Barona Vilar (ed.), Global Perspectives on ADR, (Intersentia: Cambridge, 2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2403142
  23. Strong, Stacie I. “Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation,” (2016) 73 Washington and Lee Law Review https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1639&context=facpubs (Last accessed, January 03, 2025)
  24. Strong, Stacie I. “Beyond international commercial arbitration - the promise of international commercial mediation,” Washington University Journal 45, no. 1 (2014): 11-39. https://journals.library.wustl.edu/lawpolicy/article/885/galley/17720/view/ (Last accessed, November 24, 2025)
  25. Sandrock, Otto. “The Choice Between Forum Selection, Mediation and Arbitration Clauses: European Perspectives,” American Review of International Arbitration 20, (2009): 37, cited in Strong, Stacie. “Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation,” Washington and Lee Law Review 73, no. 4 (2016): 1973-2085. https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1639&context=facpubs (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  26. Szabó, Sarolta. “Brief summary of the evolution of the EU regulation on private international law,” Iustum Aequum Salutare 7, no. 2 (2011): 143-151. https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/773/1/000679841.pdf (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  27. Tiba, Firew. “The Emergence of Hybrid International Commercial Courts and the Future of Cross Border Commercial Dispute Resolution in Asia,” Loyola University Chicago International Law Review 14, no. 1 (2016): 31-53. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2943870 (Last accessed, February 15, 2025)
  28. Tymowski, Jan. The Mediation Directive: European Implementation Assessment. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service, 2016. 1-35. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/593789/EPRS_IDA(2016)593789_EN.pdf (Last accessed, February 12, 2025)
  29. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation with Guide to Enactment and Use. 2002. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/03-90953_ebook.pdf. (Last accessed, March 25, 2025)

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Yousfi, M. (2025). International Commercial Mediation and the Development of the Right of Access to Justice. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (11), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.18523/2414-9942.11.2025.185-201

Issue

No. 11 (2025): Kyiv-Mohyla Law & Politics Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Mourad Yousfi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.).

Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:

distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially

...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal.

The copyright in the article or any other submission to Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal shall remain with the author(s).

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.