Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession as an introduction to the use of the Cohesion Fund

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/2414-9942.11.2025.1-15

Keywords:

ISPA, pre-accession funds, EU funds, Cohesion Policy, Cohesion Fund, infrastructure, Poland

Abstract

The transformation processes of 1989 initiated Central European countries’ aspirations to integrate with Western Europe. In response, the world’s leading industrialized nations pledged support for systemic transformation, leading to the European Community’s establishment of the PHARE program in 1989 for Poland and Hungary. Over time, this assistance expanded to other aspiring EU member states, forming a coordinated pre-accession strategy.
A key financial instrument within this strategy was the Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), introduced in 2000. Modelled on the EU’s Cohesion Fund, ISPA aimed to support economic and social cohesion through large-scale investments in environmental protection and transport infrastructure. The program facilitated compliance with EU environmental standards and the development of trans-European transport networks (TENs). In Poland, ISPA-funded projects improved air and water quality, waste management, and integrated national transport systems with EU networks.
The literature on the use of pre-accession funding and ISPA in particular is fragmented and not abundant. Therefore, this article sheds light on ISPA’s programming, application processes, implementation challenges, and outcomes in a comprehensive way. The study employs legal analysis, critical evaluation of reports, and statistical data to assess ISPA’s performance. The findings provide insights into optimizing pre-accession assistance mechanisms and guiding future EU cohesion policy funding. It also serves as a source of policy-learning for the prospective EU Member States.

Author Biographies

Robert Talaga, Voivodship Administrative Court in Poznań

PhD in law (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań), assessor in Voivodship Court of Administration in Poznań, Poland.

Ida Musiałkowska, Poznań University of Economics and Business

PhD hab. in economics, PUEB Professor; head of Department of European Studies at the Pozanń University of Economics and Business, Poland; vice-chair of Regional Studies Association.

References

  1. Brenck, A., Beckers, T., Heinrich, M., and C. Hirschhausen. 2005. “Public-private partnerships in new EU member countries of Central and Eastern Europe: An economic analysis with case studies from the highway sector.” Public Sector Management and Regulation Working Papers, Reprint from EIB Papers, Vol. 10, No. 2 (2005), 82-112
  2. Court of Auditors. 2003. Special Report No 5/2003 Concerning PHARE and ISPA Funding of Environmental Projects in the Candidate Countries Together with the Commission's Replies. Official Journal C 167, 17 July, 1–20.
  3. Court of Auditors. 2005. Special Report No 6/2005 on the Trans-European Network for Transport (TEN-T) Together with the Commission’s Replies. Official Journal C 94, 21 April, 1–36.
  4. Court of Auditors. 2009. Special Report No 12/2008 - Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (ISPA), 2000–2006. Official Journal C 108, 12 May, 7.
  5. Dąbrowski, M., Musiałkowska, I., and L. Polverari. 2018. “Introduction: Drawing Lessons from International Policy-Transfer Initiatives in Regional and Urban Development and Spatial Planning”. Regional Studies 52 (9): 1165–68. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1462490.
  6. Florio, M., and S. Vignetti. 2003. “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Infrastructure Projects in an Enlarged European Union: An Incentive-Oriented Approach.” Working Paper n.13/2003. Evaluation Conference, European Union, Budapest 26-27.06.2003 https://air.unimi.it/bitstream/2434/610151/2/30.pdf
  7. Formuszewicz, R. 2007. Kontrola prawidłowości wykorzystania funduszy strukturalnych - wyzwania dla polskiej administracji [in:] Dostosowania do wymogów Unii Europejskiej. Przykład Polski, ed. Piotr Kalka, Instytut Zachodni, Poznań 2007, pp. 197-215
  8. Fraser, A., F. Gross, J. Bachtler, and S. Miller. 2012. Ex Post Evaluation of the Cohesion Fund (Including Former ISPA): Work Package D: Management and Implementation. EPRC, Glasgow. https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/publications/ex-post-evaluation-of-the-cohesion-fund-including-former-ispa-wor.
  9. Gasparski, K., Iwaniecka, M., Krępska, M., Kubylis, R., Kucińska, Z., Rożnowicz, M., Witowski, W., Włodarczak, A., and M. Zalewska. 2009. PHARE Socio-Economic Cohesion. Programme Summary. Eds. Agnieszka Haber and Witold Witowski. Ministry of Regional Development, Polish Agency for Enterprise Development.
  10. Grabowska, G. 2000. Poland on the Way to the European Union: From Association to Accession in the Context of Environmental Policy (in:) Legal Convergence in the Enlarged Europe of the New Millenium, (ed.) Paul L.C. Torremans, Kluwer Law International, The Hague—Boston—London 2000, p. 1–20.
  11. Grosse, T.G. 2003. „Szanse i zagrożenia dla wykorzystania funduszy Unii Europejskiej”, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, No. 2:99.
  12. Grudzińska, L., A. Harassek, and W. Wojtkielewicz. 2003. "Kolejowe programy inwestycyjne realizowane ze współudziałem środków Unii Europejskiej." Prawo i Finanse, No. 3: 39.
  13. Hirschhausen, C. 2002. Modernizing Infrastructure in Transformation Economies: Paving the Way to European Enlargement, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.1-280
  14. Komornicki,T., and B. Szejgiec-Kolenda. 2020. “The development of transport infrastructure in Poland and the role of spatial planning and cohesion policy in investment processes”. Planning Practice & Research, 2020, 38(5), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1852677
  15. Laursen, T. and B. Myers. 2009. “Public Investment Management in the New EU Member States: Strengthening Planning and Implementation of Transport Infrastructure Investments”. World Bank Working Paper, 2009, No. 161.. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7894-6
  16. Morata, F., and A. Noferini. 2009. Introduction to European Cohesion Policy for Candidate and Potential Candidate Countries. Framework, Experiences and Instruments. Institut Universitari d’Estudis Europeus, Barcelona.
  17. Musiałkowska, I. Wykorzystanie doświadczeń Unii Europejskiej w zakresie polityki spójności przez Mercosur, Difin, Warszawa, 2017
  18. Popowska, B.. 2007. Ustrój polityczno-gospodarczy Polski między centralizacją a decentralizacją, [in:] Dostosowania do wymogów Unii Europejskiej. Przykład Polski, ed. Piotr Kalka, Instytut Zachodni, Poznań 2007, pp. 13-32 .
  19. Rokicki, B., and M.W. Socha. 2008. „Effects of Poland's Integration with the EU: Structural Interventions and Economic Development in the Eastern Border Regions”, The Journal of Comparative Economic Studies, The Japanese Society for Comparative Economic Studies (JSCES), 2008, vol. 4, pp 81-114.
  20. Talaga, R. 2024. "Zdolność administracyjna „instytucji zarządzającej” w obszarze polityki spójności." In: Zdolność administracyjna państwa członkowskiego i kandydata do Unii Europejskiej. Pojęcie, przejawy i determinanty, eds. D. Dzvinchuk, A. Khaletska, V. Kovalchuk, M. Mączyński, and E. Skorczyńska, 281–289. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  21. Tkaczyński, J. W., and G. Rossmann. 2003. Fundusze Unii Europejskiej. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Temida 2.
  22. Wegener, M.,Komornicki, T., and P. Korcelli. 2005. Spatial Impacts of the Trans-European Networks for the New EU Member States, [in:] “New Spatial Relations in New Europe” (eds.) T. Komornicki and K. Czapiewski, EUROPA XXI, 2005, 13, 27-43; Warszawa, https://rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/3092/Wa51_13309_r2005-t13_EuropaXXI.pdf
  23. Żuber, P.. 2023. EU Pre-accession Processes in the Fields of Decentralisation, Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments. The Case of Poland. Kyiv.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Talaga, R., & Musiałkowska, I. (2025). Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession as an introduction to the use of the Cohesion Fund. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18523/2414-9942.11.2025.1-15