The Kremlin’s Malign Legal Operations on the Black Sea: Analyzing the Exploitation of Public International Law Against Ukraine

Authors

  • Brad Fisher National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj190000.2019-5.193-223

Keywords:

Malign Legal Operations, lawfare, international law, international relations, Ukraine, Russia, hybrid warfare

Abstract

This article seeks to analyze the asymmetric manipulation and exploitation of legal domains to achieve political objectives. A multidisciplinary analysis is offered to explore the perversion of the law to shape legitimacy, contain adversaries, justify violations, escape obligations, and ultimately to advantageously revise the international and domestic rule of law. Colloquially known as lawfare, this article offers a discourse analysis of the term and asserts that a more doctrinally appropriate phrase exists to describe this phenomenon; Malign Legal Operations (MALOPs). Furthermore, this article asserts that MALOPs are the root of contemporary hybrid warfare and that all other hybrid means are secondary. In particular, the Russian Federation’s behavior towards Ukraine in the Black Sea region is used as a case study to determine the extent of these MALOPs and to explore what measures can be taken to defend the rule of law.
The primary example offered is Russia’s November 25th, 2018 attack on three Ukrainian Naval vessels in the Kerch Strait and its capture of 24 sailors. Supplementary examples include the annexation of Crimea, manipulations of the Montreux Convention, and Russia’s overall aggression towards Ukraine.

Author Biography

Brad Fisher, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy

Major Brad Fisher is a United States Air Force officer and pilot with numerous combat deployments. He is currently studying abroad with the Olmsted Foundation and working towards a PhD at National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy in the field of international law. His research is in Malign Legal Operations (a. k. a. Lawfare) and the malicious application of Public International Law. The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

References

  1. Bartman, Christi Scott. “Lawfare and the Definition of Aggression: What the Soviet Union and Russian Federation Can Teach Us.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 43, no. 2 (2010): 423–45.
  2. Bilyk, Danylo. “What You Need to Know about the Conflict in the Sea of Azov.” DW News, 2018. https://www. dw. com/en/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-conflictin-the-sea-of-azov/a‑46461361.
  3. Bogdanov, Vladimir. “Ukrainian Fleet Lost Access to the Azov Sea.” Russian Gazette, 2015. https://rg. ru/2015/06/23/flot-site. html.
  4. Chen, Ti-Chiang. The International Law of Recognition. New York: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1951. https://archive. org/details/cu31924016945770/page/n7.
  5. Chernichenko, Stanislav Valentinovich. “Ideological Aggression as the Use of Force in International Law.” Eurasian Legal Journal 1 (2019): 21–24.
  6. Clausewitz, Carl Von. On War. Edited by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  7. Cruickshank, Michael. “Investigating The Kerch Strait Incident—Bellingcat.” bellingcat, 2018. https://www. bellingcat. com/news/uk-and-europe/2018/11/30/investigatingthe-kerch-strait-incident/.
  8. Czekaj, Matthew. “PRESS RELEASE: Russia Announces Closure of Kerch Strait, Cutting Southeastern Ukraine off From Access to Black Sea—Jamestown.” The Jamestown Foundation, 2017. https://jamestown. org/program/russia-announces-closure-ofkerch-strait-cutting-southeastern-ukraine-off-from-access-to-black-sea/.
  9. Devrim Yaylalı, Cem. “Russian Submarine Makes Mysterious Exit From Black Sea.” USNI News, 2019. https://news. usni. org/2019/03/18/russian-submarine-makesmysterious-exit-black-sea.
  10. Dunlap Jr., Charles J. “Lawfare 101: A Primer.” MILITARY REVIEW. Vol. 8, 2017. https://sites. duke. edu/lawfire/.
  11. Dunlap Jr., Charles J. “Lawfare Today: A Perspective.” Yale Journal of International Affairs, no. Winter Issue (2011): 146–54. http://yalejournal. org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/083111dunlap. pdf.
  12. F. Kittrie, Orde. Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War. Disputatio, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780190263577.001.0001.
  13. FSB via Sputnik. “Ukrainian Naval Ships Ignored Calls to Stop, Violated Russian State Border—FSB.” Sputnik International, 2018. https://sputniknews. com/russia/201811261070123720-ukraine-navalships-azov-balcks-sea-kerch/.
  14. Hoffman, Frank G. “The Rise of Hybrid Wars,” 2007. http://www. potomacinstitute. org/.International Institute for Strategic Studies. “The Military Balance 2015.” The Military Balance, 2016. https://doi. org/10.1080/04597222.2016.1127567.
  15. Karaichev, Dmitry. “Myths about the Illegality of the Transfer of Crimea in 1954.” ZN. UA, 2013. https://zn. ua/internal/mify-o-nezakonnosti-peredachi-kryma-v‑1954-godu. html.
  16. Kennan, George. “The Long Telegram.” The National Security Archive, 1946.
  17. Kissinger, Henry. World Order. New York: Penguin Books, 2015.
  18. Kofman, Michael., Katya. Migacheva, Brian Nichiporuk, Andrew. Radin, Olesya Tkacheva, and Jenny. Oberholtzer. Lessons from Russia’s Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, 2017. https://doi. org/10.7249/RR 1498.
  19. Kraska, James. “EJIL: Talk!—The Kerch Strait Incident: Law of the Sea or Law of Naval Warfare?” Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 2018. https://www.ejiltalk. org/the-kerch-strait-incident-law-of-the-sea-or-law-of-naval-warfare/.
  20. League of Nations. “1936 Montreux Convention,” 1936. http://sam. baskent. edu. tr/belge/Montreux_ENG. pdf.
  21. Maggs, Peter B, Olga Schwartz, and William Burnham. Law and Legal System of the Russian Federation. Sixth. New York: Juris Publishing, Inc., 2015. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=J0jwCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR21&dq=Russian+Legal+System&ots=uO_Un7Ih5J&sig=LYkZ31kADv7Xg9KD_2sGzLnp0Uc#v=onepage&q&f=true.
  22. Mälksoo, Lauri. Russian Approaches to International Law. Russian Approaches to International Law, 2015. https://doi. org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198723042.001.0001.
  23. NYT. “THE END OF THE SOVIET UNION; Text of Declaration: ‘Mutual Recognition’ and ‘an Equal Basis.’” The New York Times, 1991. https://www. nytimes. com/1991/12/22/world/end-soviet-union-text-declaration-mutual-recognition-equal-basis. html.
  24. Office of Legal Affairs—United Nations. “United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 1982. http://www. un. org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/UNCLOS-TOC. htm.
  25. Peterson, Nolan. “An Embattled Ukrainian Port City Braces for Russian ‘Economic Warfare.’” The Daily Signal, 2018. https://www. dailysignal. com/2018/12/05/anembattled-ukrainian-port-city-braces-for-russian-economic-warfare/.
  26. Pifer, Steven. “Mr. Lavrov, Russia, and the Budapest Memorandum.” The Brookings Institute, 2016. https://www. brookings. edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2016/01/28/mr-lavrov-russia-and-the-budapest-memorandum/.
  27. Pindják, Peter. “Deterring Hybrid Warfare: A Chance for NATO and the EU to Work Together?” NATO Review Magazine. Accessed December 15, 2018. https://www.nato. int/docu/review/2014/Also-in‑2014/Deterring-hybrid-warfare/EN/index.htm.
  28. Posner, Vladimir. “March 3 in the Program " Posner"-Alexander Zhukov.” Posner Online, 2014. https://pozneronline. ru/2014/02/7071/.
  29. Pravda. RU. “Our Forever: Decree of 1954 on Transfer of Crimea Will Be Cancelled.” Pravda. RA, 2017. https://www. pravda. ru/news/world/07–11–2017/1352550-crimea‑0/.
  30. Putin, Vladimir. “Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club.” Kremlin. Ru, 2014.
  31. Putin, Vladimir. “Putin Speech and the Following Discussion at the 2007 Munich Conference on Security Policy.” Munich, 2007. http://russialist. org/transcript-putin-speechand-the-following-discussion-at-the-munich-conference-on-security-policy/.
  32. Putin, Vladimir. “Vladimir Putin Answered Questions from Journalists about the Situation in Ukraine.” The Kremlin, 2014. http://www. kremlin. ru/events/president/news/20366.
  33. RIA. “Lawyer Calls Provocation in Kerch Strait a Reason for Lawsuit against Ukraine.” RIA Novosti Crimea, 2019. https://crimea. ria. ru/society/20190613/1116835704.html.
  34. Saha, David, Vitaliy Kravchuk, and Veronika Movchan. “The Impact of the New Kerch Strait Bridge on Ukraine’s Trade.” Accessed December 15, 2018. https://www.beratergruppe-ukraine. de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/PB_02_2018_en. pdf.
  35. Sari, Aurel. “Legal Resilience in an Era of Gray Zone Conflicts and Hybrid Threats.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.3315682.
  36. Schatz, Valentin J., and Dmytro Koval. “Russia’s Annexation of Crimea and the Passage of Ships Through Kerch Strait: A Law of the Sea Perspective.” Ocean Development & International Law 0, no. 0 (2019): 1–23. https://doi. org/10.1080/00908320.2019.1605677.
  37. Shishkin, Alexander. “Russian Submarines Are Prevented from Operating in the Mediterranean Sea.” Vzhlyad, 2018. https://vz. ru//world/2018/5/28/924562. html.
  38. Shuster, Simon. “Russian Media Try to Deal With Vladimir Putin’s Honesty on Crimea.” TIME, 2015. http://time. com/3752827/putin-media-kremlin-crimea-ukraine/.
  39. Simon, Jeff. “Transcript: Vladimir Putin’s April 17 Q& A.” The Washington Post, 2014. https://www. washingtonpost. com/world/transcript-vladimir-putinsapril‑17-qanda/2014/04/17/ff77b4a2-c635–11e3–8b9a‑8e0977a24aeb_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9f9852e2a90e.
  40. The Council of Europe. “Legal Challenges Related to Hybrid War and Human Rights Obligations,” 2018. https://assembly. coe. int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML‑en.asp?fileid=24762.
  41. The Kremlin. “Vladimir Putin Interview with The Financial Times,” 2019. http://en.kremlin. ru/events/president/news/60836.
  42. Tolve, Robert De. “At What Cost? America’s UNCLOS Allergy In The Time of ‘Lawfare.’” Naval Law Review 61 (2012). http://www. jag. navy. mil/documents/navylawreview/NLRVolume61. pdf.
  43. Tucker, Patrick. “Russia Launched Cyber Attacks Against Ukraine Before Ship Seizures, Firm Says.” DefenseOne, 2018. https://www. defenseone. com/technology/2018/12/russia-launched-cyber-attacks-against-ukraine-ship-seizures-firm-says/153375/.
  44. Ukraine and Russian Federation. “Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation,” 1997. https://treaties. un. org/doc/Publication/UNTS/No Volume/52240/Part/I‑52240–08000002803e6fae. pdf.
  45. Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “10 Facts You Should Know about Russian Military Aggression Against Ukraine.” Accessed January 7, 2019. https://mfa. gov. ua/en/page/open/id/5026.
  46. Underwood, Maeve. “A Short History Of The ‘Winter War.’” Imperial War Museums, 2018. https://www. iwm. org. uk/history/a-short-history-of-the-winter-war.
  47. Voyger, Mark. NATO at 70 and the Baltic States: Strengthening the Euro-Atlantic Alliance in an Age of Non-Linear Threats. Estonia. Tartu: Baltic Defense College, 2019. http://www. baltdefcol. org/files/files/publications/NATO_AT_70_AND_THE_BALTIC_STATES. pdf.
  48. Walton, TA. “China’s Three Warfares,” no. January (2012): 1–12. http://www. delex. com/data/files/Three Warfares.pdf.

Downloads

How to Cite

Fisher, B. (2019). The Kremlin’s Malign Legal Operations on the Black Sea: Analyzing the Exploitation of Public International Law Against Ukraine. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (5), 193–223. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj190000.2019-5.193-223

Issue

No. 5 (2019): Legal and Political Challenges of Anticorruption Activities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Brad Fisher

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.).

Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:

distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially

...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal.

The copyright in the article or any other submission to Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal shall remain with the author(s).

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.