The Influence of Public Corruption and Human Values on Trust in the Police: A European Cross-National Perspective

Authors

  • Sabrina Pfister Institute of Sociology University of Zurich, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj189993.2019-5.119-140

Keywords:

Trust in the Police, CPI, Human Values, ESS, Multilevel analysis

Abstract

Police forces are an important part of every democratic system and depend on societal legitimacy to perform their duties. Societal legitimacy stems from compliance with binding principles, like human rights and national law, and from broad acceptance from the people. Accordingly, police forces need the public’s trust to perform their duties in today’s European democracies. This paper investigates trust in police forces based on individual and contextual factors found in European countries. To explain trust in police forces, this paper uses human values on an individual level as well as perceived public-sector corruptionon a macro level. The analysis is based on data from the European Social Survey 2016 (ESS) and the Corruption Perception Index 2015 (CPI). It combines individual and contextual factors using multilevel models to explore differing levels of trust in police forces as well as the dynamics between perceived public-sector corruption, human values, and trust in the police. The results confirm previous findings that trust in police forces erodes in the face of perceived public-sector corruption, while human values play a sub-ordered role in the explanation of trust in the police in European countries.

Author Biography

Sabrina Pfister, Institute of Sociology University of Zurich

Sociologist and senior project leader at the LINK institution. She is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Sociology of University of Zurich, Switzerland. The aim of her dissertation is to gain a better understanding of the different trust relationships in Switzerland, Europe and the world. The influence of corruption at the country level is complemented by individual explanatory variables, mainly human values and migration background. For the analyses mainly structural equation models and multi-level analyses are used. Furthermore, her research focuses on issues such as trust in institutions, corruption and female leadership.

References

  1. Afon, Abel O., and Adewumi I. Badiora. “Accounting for Variation in Perception of Police: A Study of Residents in a Nigerian City.” The Police Journal 89, no. 3 (2016): 241–56.
  2. Albrecht, Stan L., and Miles Green. “Attitudes toward the Police and the Larger Attitude Complex: Implications for Police-Community Relationships.” Criminology 15, no. 1 (1977): 67–86.
  3. Anderson, Christopher J., and Matthew M. Singer. “The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right.” Comparative Political Studies 41, 4–5 (2008): 564–99.
  4. Bardi, Anat, Kathryn E. Buchanan, Robin Goodwin, Letitia Slabu, and Mark Robinson. “Value Stability and Change during Self-Chosen Life Transitions: Self-Selection versus Socialization Effects.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106, no. 1 (2014): 131–47.
  5. Basu, Parikshit K. “Corruption: A Theoretical Perspective and Relevance for Economic Growth.” International Review of Business Research Papers 2, no. 4 (2006): 59–68.
  6. Benson, Paul R. “Political Alienation and Public Satisfaction with Police Services.” The Pacific Sociological Review 24, no. 1 (1981): 45–64.
  7. Benz, Arthur. “Vertrauensbildung in Mehrebenensystemen.” In Politisches Vertrauen: Soziale Grundlagen reflexiver Kooperation. Edited by Rainer Schmalz-Bruns and Reinhard Zintl, 275–91. Schriftenreihe der Sektion Politische Theorien und Ideengeschichte in der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft 2. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002.
  8. Borchert, Jens. “Einleitung: Von Berufskölnern, alten Römern und paradoxen Konsequenzen.” In Politische Korruption. Edited by Jens Borchert, Sigrid Leitner and Klaus Stolz, 7–17. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2000.
  9. Brown, Ben, and Wm Reed Benedict. “Perceptions of the Police: Past Findings, Methodological Issues, Conceptual Issues and Policy Implications.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 25, no. 3 (2002): 543–80.
  10. Cao, Liqun, James Frank, and Francis T. Cullen. “Race, Community Context and Confidence in the Police.” American Journal of Police 15, no. 1 (1996): 3–22.
  11. Cao, Liqun, Steven J. Stack, and Yi Sun. “Public Attitudes toward the Police.” Journal of Criminal Justice 26, no. 4 (1998): 279–89.
  12. Chabova, Kristyna. “Corruption in European Countries: A Cross-National Comparison.” In Values and identities in Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Ed. Michael J. Breen, 143–59. Routledge advances in sociology 202. London, New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
  13. Chabova, Kristyna. “Measuring corruption in Europe: Public opinion surveys and composite indices.” Quality & Quantity 51, no. 4 (2017): 1877–1900.
  14. Charlton, Christopher, Jon Rasbash, William J. Browne, Michael J. R. Healy, and Bruce Cameron. MLwiN. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, 2017.
  15. Cheurprakobkit, Sutham. “Police-Citizen Contact and Police Performance Attitutional Differences between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics.” Journal of Criminal Justice 28, no. 4 (2000): 325–36.
  16. Davidov, Eldad. “Testing for Comparability of Human Values across Countries and Time with the Third Round of the European Social Survey.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 51, no. 3 (2010): 171–91.
  17. Davidov, Eldad, Bart Meulemann, Shalom H. Schwartz, and Peter Schmidt. “Individual Values, Cultural Embeddedness, and Anti-Immigration Sentiments: Explaining Differences in the Effect of Values on Attitudes toward Immigration across Europe.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 66, S 1 (2014): 263–85.
  18. Dederichs, Andrea Maria. “Vertrauen als affektive Handlungsdimension: Ein emotionssoziologischer Bericht.” In Interpersonales Vertrauen: Theorien und empirische Befunde. Edited by Martin K. W. Schweer, 62–77. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1997.
  19. Easton, David. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley, 1965.
  20. Ervasti, Heikki, Antti Kouvo, and Takis Venetoklis. “Social and Institutional Trust in Times of Crisis: Greece, 2002–2011.” Social Indicators Research 141, no. 3 (2019): 1207–31.
  21. ESS. “Data Round 8: Data file edition 2.1.” Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway, Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC, Norway, 2016.
  22. Gabbidon, Shaun L., and George E. Higgins. “The Role of Race/Ethnicity and Race Relations on Public Opinion Related to the Treatment of Blacks by the Police.” Police Quarterly 12, no. 1 (2009): 102–15.
  23. Gamson, William A. Power and discontent. Homewood Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1968.
  24. Grönlund, Kimmo, and Maija Setälä. “In Honest Officials We Trust: Institutional Confidence in Europe.” The American Review of Public Administration 42, no. 5 (2011): 523–42.
  25. Grund, Simon, Oliver Lüdtke, and Alexander Robitzsch. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Data for Multilevel Models: Simulations and Recommendations.” Organizational Research Methods 21, no. 1 (2018): 111–49.
  26. Gukenbiehl, Hermann L. “Institution und Organisation.” In Einführung in Hauptbegriffe der Soziologie. Edited by Hermann Korte and Bernhard Schäfers. 6th ed., 143–59. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2003.
  27. Harrell, Frank E. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package. 2019.
  28. Heise, David R. “Causal Inference from Panel Data.” Sociological Methodology 2 (1970): 3.
  29. Höhne, Benjamin. Vertrauen oder Misstrauen? Wie stehen die Ostdeutschen 15 Jahre nach der Wiedervereinigung zu ihrem politischen System? Marburg: Tectum, 2006. http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2774541&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.
  30. Homer, Pamela M., and Lynn R. Kahle. “A Structural Equation Test of the Value-AttitudeBehavior Hierarchy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, no. 4 (1988): 638–46.
  31. Hox, Joop. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2002. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0634/2001057760-d.html.
  32. Huntington, Samuel P. “Political Development and Political Decay.” World Politics 17, no. 3 (1965): 386–430.
  33. Imai, Kosuke, Luke Keele, Dustin Tingley, and Teppei Yamamoto. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105, no. 4 (2011): 765–89.
  34. Inglehart, Ronald. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
  35. Jackson, Jonathan, Ben Bradford, Mike Hough, Andy Myhill, Paul Quinton, and Tom R. Tyler. “Why do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions.” British Journal of Criminology 52, no. 6 (2012): 1051–71.
  36. Kääriäinen, Juha. “Trust in the Police in 16 European Countries: A Multilevel Analysis.” European Journal of Criminology 4, no. 4 (2007): 409–35.
  37. Karahan, Gökhan R., R. Morris Coats, and William F. Shughart. “Corrupt political jurisdictions and voter participation.” Public Choice 126, 1–2 (2006): 87–106.
  38. Kostadinova, Tatiana. “Abstain or Rebel: Corruption Perceptions and Voting in East European Elections.” Politics & Policy 37, no. 4 (2009): 691–714.
  39. Luhmann, Niklas. Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. 4. th ed. UTB 2185. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, 2000 [1968].
  40. Mawby, Rob I. “Models of policing.” In Handbook of Policing. Edited by Tim Newburn. 2nd ed., 17–46. London: Routledge, 2009.
  41. Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 1 (2001): 30–62.
  42. Morselli, Davide, Dario Spini, and Thierry Devos. “Trust in Institutions and Human Values in the European Context: A Comparison between the World Value Survey and the European Social Survey.” Psicologia sociale 10, no. 3 (2015).
  43. Newton, Kenneth, and Pippa Norris. “Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture or Performance?” In Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Ed. Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam, 52–73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
  44. Nuissl, Henning. “Bausteine des Vertrauens: Eine Begriffsanalyse.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 12, no. 1 (2002): 87–108.
  45. Obermaier, Frederik, and Bastian Obermayer. “A Storm is Coming: Panama papers.” Accessed October 31, 2019. https://panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/
  46. articles/56fec0cda1bb8d3c3495adfc/.
  47. Obermaier, Frederik, and Bastian Obermayer. “Die Panama Papers in aller Welt: Russland.” Accessed October 31, 2019. https://panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/articles/56fec0cda1bb8d3c3495adfc/.
  48. Pfister, Sabrina. “Vertrauen in die Polizei: Schweiz—Europa—Welt.” Dissertation, Universität Zürich, 2020-forthcoming.
  49. Plumpe, Werner. “Korruption: Annäherungen an ein historisches und gesellschaftliches Phänomen.” In Geld—Geschenke—Politik: Korruption im neuzeitlichen Europa. Edited by Jens I. Engels, Andreas Fahrmeir and Alexander Nützenadel, 19–48. Historische Zeitschrift Beihefte N. F., 48. München: Oldenbourg, 2009.
  50. Quentin, Ariès. “EU vows to act quickly on Panama Papers.” Accessed October 31, 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers_(Europe).
  51. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical. Wien, Österreich: R Foundation for Statistical Computin, 2019. https://www.R‑project.org/.
  52. Rokeach, Milton. The Nature of Human Values. New York, London: The Free Press; Collier MacMillan, 1973.
  53. Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. JHU Press, 1998.
  54. Rothstein, Bo. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  55. Rothstein, Bo. “Anti-Corruption: The Indirect ‘Big Bang’ Approach.” Review of International Political Economy 18, no. 2 (2011): 228–50.
  56. Schwartz, Shalom H. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 25. Ed. Mark P. Zanna, 1–65. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992.
  57. Schwartz, Shalom H. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?” Journal of Social Issues 50, no. 4 (1994): 19–45.
  58. Schwartz, Shalom H. “Value Orientations: Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences across Nations.” Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey, 2007, 161–93.
  59. Semukhina, Olga, and K. Michael Reynolds. “Russian Citizens’ Perceptions of Corruption and Trust of the Police.” Policing and Society 24, no. 2 (2014): 158–88.
  60. Staubli, Silvia. Trusting the Police: Comparisons across Eastern and Western Europe. Bielefeld: transcript, 2017. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=634763.
  61. Stegmueller, Daniel. “How Many Countries for Multilevel Modeling? A Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches.” American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 3 (2013): 748–61.
  62. Sunshine, Jason, and Tom R. Tyler. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.” Law & Society Review 37, no. 3 (2003): 513–48.
  63. The International Consortium of Investigate Journalists. “Giant Leak of Offshore Financial Records Exposes Global Array of Crime and Corruption.” Accessed October 31, 2019. https://www.webcitation.org/6gVXG3LvI?url=https://www.occrp.org/en/panamapapers/overview/intro/.
  64. Transparency International. “What is Corruption?” Accessed June 19, 2018. https://www.transparency.org/%20what-is-corruption#define.
  65. Transparency International Schweiz. “Geschäftsgrundsätze für die Bekämpfung von Korruption, Ausgabe für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen (KMU).” Bern, 2008.
  66. Tyler, Tom R. “Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?” Behavioral sciences & the law 19, no. 2 (2001): 215–35.
  67. Tyler, Tom R. “Trust and Legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe.” European Journal of Criminology 8, no. 4 (2011): 254–66.
  68. Uslaner, Eric M. “Trust and Corruption.” In The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. Edited by Johann G. Lambsdorff, Markus Taube and Matthias Schramm, 76–92.
  69. Routhledge frontiers of political economy 64. London: Routledge, 2006. von Alemann, Ulrich. “Politische Korruption: Ein Wegweiser zum Stand der Forschung.”
  70. In Dimension politischer Korruption: Beiträge zum Stand der internationalen Forschung. Edited by Ulrich von Alemann, 13–48. Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderhefte. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2005.
  71. Warren, Mark E. “What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?” American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 2 (2004): 328–43.
  72. Wilz, Sylvia M. “Die Polizei als Organisation.” In Handbuch Organisationstypen. Edited by Maja Apelt and Veronika Tacke, 113–31. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2012.

Downloads

How to Cite

Pfister, S. (2019). The Influence of Public Corruption and Human Values on Trust in the Police: A European Cross-National Perspective. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (5), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj189993.2019-5.119-140

Issue

No. 5 (2019): Kyiv-Mohyla Law & Politics Journal: Legal and Political Challenges of Anticorruption Activities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Sabrina Pfister

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.).

Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:

distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially

...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal.

The copyright in the article or any other submission to Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal shall remain with the author(s).

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.