Humanizing (Anti)Corruption: The Socio-Legal Values of a Human Rights-Based Approach to Corruption

Authors

  • Bruna de Castro e Silva University of Gothenburg, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj189985.2019-5.59-81

Keywords:

human rights-based approach, corruption, economic and social rights, justiciability, socio-legal values, social harm, inequality, legal empowerment

Abstract

This article intends to contribute to the current academic and policy debate on the values of determining whether a particular human rights violation was caused by a corrupt behavior; and to defend a human rights-based approach to corruption, based on its added socio-legal values. With this purpose, it analyzes and compares the legal reasoning and socio-legal dynamics of three human rights court cases involving and not involving corruption. By applying a directed content analysis combined with a socio-legal interpretative technique, the study explores and compares the rationality and the values addressed in both corrupt and non-corrupt cases. The results reveal that there are interconnected and mutually reinforcing socio-legal values in applying a human rights lens to combating corruption: (i) it is an improvement towards the justiciability of economic and social rights; (ii) it is a change of paradigm from the insufficient criminal approach to a focus on the social harm; and (iii) it is a more satisfactory approach to the overlapping harmful effects of corruption and inequality. The combination of these values can be used as a legal empowerment strategy, with a particular social accountability dimension, in order to strengthen the disadvantaged, and fight the encroachment caused by corruption on the enjoyment of human rights, especially economic and social rights.

Author Biography

Bruna de Castro e Silva, University of Gothenburg

Bruna de Castro e Silva holds a JD from the University of Sao Paulo, is an M.A. candidate in Human Rights Policy and Practice, at the University of Gothenburg, and a Lawyer. Expertise, interests and research subjects include, but are not limited to, human rights, anti-corruption, good governance, and development. She has interned at The Program on Governance and Local Development, Political Sciences Department, at the University of Gothenburg; and at the Organization of American States (OAS), Washington, D.C., US. At the OAS, she worked for the Mechanism for the Follow-Up on the Implementation of the Inter-American Convention against Corruption (MESICIC), assisting member countries in the drafting of policy reforms related to anti-corruption and transparency.

References

  1. American Convention on Human Rights. (Pact of San Jose Costa Rica). Organization of American States. November 22, 1969. https://www.oas.org/dil/access_to_information_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.pdf.
  2. Amnesty International. “Human Rights for Human Dignity: A Primer on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Updated 2014. Accessed March 8, 2019. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/8000/pol340012014en.pdf.
  3. Andersen, Morten Koch. “Why Corruption Matters in Human Rights.”Journal of Human Rights Practice 10, no. 1 (2018): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huy004.
  4. Annan, Kofi. “UN Secretary-General Foreword to the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC).” United Nations, 2003.
  5. Banik, Dan. “Legal Empowerment as a Conceptual and Operational Tool in Poverty Eradication.”Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1, no. 01 (2009): 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404509001171.
  6. Barkhouse, Angela, Hugo Hoyland, and Marc Limon. “Corruption: A Human Rights Impact Assessment.” Updated 2018. Accessed January 20, 2019. https://www.universal-rights.org/urg-policy-reports/corruption-human-rights-impact-assessment/.
  7. Bryman, Alan.Social Research Methods. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
  8. Chynoweth, Paul. “Legal Research.” In Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. Edited by Andrew Knight and Leslie Ruddock. Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom, Ames, Iowa: Wiley, 2008.
  9. Feenan, Dermot. “Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies.” In Exploring the ‘Socio’of Socio-Legal Studies. Vol. 38. Edited by Dermot Feenan, 3–19. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. London: Macmillan Education UK; Imprint; Palgrave, 2013.
  10. General Assembly. “Report of the Independent Expert on the Question of Human Rights and Extreme Poverty: A/65/259.” United Nations, 2010. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N10/478/79/PDF/N1047879.pdf?OpenElement.
  11. Golub, Stephen. “What Is Legal Empowerment? An Introduction.” Updated 2010. Accessed February 2, 2019. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/138100/Golub_Introduction.pdf.
  12. Gonzales Lluy Y Otros V. Ecuador. Inter-American Court of Human Rights, September 1, 2015. Accessed March 28, 2019. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_298_esp.pdf.
  13. Hensgen, Leonie. “Corruption and Human Rights – Making the Connection at the United Nations.”Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online 17, no. 1 (2013): 197-219. Accessed May 9, 2018. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/content/journals/10.1163/18757413-90000085.
  14. Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.”Qualitative health research 15, no. 9 (2005): 1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732305276687.
  15. Human Rights Council. “Final Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on the Issue of the Negative Impact of Corruption on the Enjoyment of Human Rights: A/HRC/28/73.” United Nations, 2015. https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/hrc/regularsessions/session28/pages/listreports.aspx.
  16. Lagos Del Campo V. Peru. Inter-American Court of Human Rights, August 31, 2017. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_340_esp.pdf.
  17. Lewis, James. “Social Impacts of Corruption Upon Community Resilience and Poverty.”Jàmbá Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 9, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v9i1.391.
  18. Mumuni, Adetokunbo. “Legal Remedies for Grand Corruption: Litigating Corruption in International Human Rights Tribunals: SERAP Before the ECOWAS Court.” Updated 2016. Accessed March 3, 2019. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/legal-remedies-grand-corruption.
  19. O'Connell, Paul. “On the Human Rights Question.”Human Rights Quarterly 40, no. 4 (2018): 962–988. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0051.
  20. Pellet, Alain. “"Human Rightism" and International Law.”The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online 10, no. 1 (2000): 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1163/221161300X00013.
  21. Peters, Anne. “Corruption as a Violation of International Human Rights.”European Journal of International Law 29, no. 4 (2018): 1251–1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy070.
  22. Peters, Anne. “The Risk and Opportunity of the Humanisation of International Anti-Corruption Law: A Rejoinder to Kevin E. Davis and Franco Peirone.” In EJIL:Talk! The Blog of the European Journal of International Law., 2019. Accessed March 26, 2019. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-risk-and-opportunity-of-the-humanisation-of-international-anti-corruption-law-a-rejoinder-to-kevin-e-davis-and-franco-peirone/#more-16904.
  23. Raoul Wallenberg Institute. “Anti-Corruption and Human Rights: How to Become Mutually Reinforcing.” Updated 2018. Accessed May 24, 2018. http://rwi.lu.se/publications/anti-corruption-human-rights-become-mutually-reinforcing/.
  24. Raoul Wallenberg Institute. “The Nexus Between Anti-Corruption and Human Rights.” Updated 2018. Accessed February 11, 2019. https://rwi.lu.se/publications/nexus-anti-corruption-human-rights/.
  25. Rose, Cecily. “The Limitations of a Human Rights Approach to Corruption.”International and Comparative Law Quarterly 65, no. 2 (2016): 405-438. Accessed February 11, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589316000038.
  26. The Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) V. The Federal Republic of Nigeria and Universal Basic Education Commission. Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States, November 30, 2010. https://ihrda.uwazi.io/en/document/qrb6wqua4frswtjqwichxgvi?page=1.
  27. The Secretariat of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. “Non Official Brief: I/A Court H.R., Case of Gonzales Lluy Et Al. V. Ecuador. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 1, 2015. Series C No. 298.” Accessed May 23, 2019. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/cf/Jurisprudencia2/overview.cfm?doc=1576&lang=en.
  28. The Special Rapporteurship on Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Rights of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. “The Special Rapporteurship on Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Rights Welcomes the Historic Decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on Justiciability in Matters of ESCER: No. D181/17.” News release. 2017. Accessed March 26, 2019. http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/media_center/PReleases/2017/181.asp.
  29. Transparency International. “Corruption by Topic: Poverty and Development.” Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.transparency.org/topic/detail/poverty_and_development.
  30. United Nations Convention Against Corruption. UNCAC. UN General Assembly. October 31, 2003. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/tools_and_publications/UN-convention-against-corruption.html.
  31. Wheeler, Sally, and P. A. Thomas. “Socio-Legal Studies.” In Law(S) Futures. Edited by D. Hayton, 267–279. Hart Publishing, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-27

How to Cite

de Castro e Silva, B. (2019). Humanizing (Anti)Corruption: The Socio-Legal Values of a Human Rights-Based Approach to Corruption. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, (5), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj189985.2019-5.59-81

Issue

No. 5 (2019): Legal and Political Challenges of Anticorruption Activities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Bruna de Castro e Silva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.).

Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:

distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially

...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal.

The copyright in the article or any other submission to Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal shall remain with the author(s).

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.