Legal Interpretation in Post-truth Society: Ukrainian Case

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj153253.2018-4.81-98

Keywords:

post-truth, legal interpretation, Ukraine, students, municipal officials

Abstract

Since Euromaidan and the beginning of annexation of Crimea and hostilities in the East of Ukraine post-truth was not much in focus of Ukrainian scholars. The events mentioned above have pulled the trigger of interest to the term in international scholarly world. Ukraine was not an exception in this situation. Having suffered through the consequences of post-truth practical application, Ukrainians have much to say on the matter of post-truth description and on the matter of dealing with it. My specific interest concerned the area of law, and this article focuses on the role post-truth plays in legal fields. I go over the basic ideas of post-truth, analyze its origin and influence, as well as provide examples of its legal application in Ukrainian environment.

Author Biography

Ievgen Zvieriev, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Department of Legal Philosophy and Constitutional Law

Ievgen Zvieriev is a Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. He received his PhD from National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy and LLM from Central European University. His research interests include legal interpretation, post-truth, legal philosophy. Dr. Zvieriev was awarded an “Instructor of the 2018 Year” by National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy Faculty of Law in June, 2018.

References

Fukuyama, Francis. Trust: The Social Virtue and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press Paperbacks, 1996.

Konev, Egor. “Zhurnalistskie printsipy v epohu postpravdy [Journalist Principles in Posttruth era].” Mezhdunarodnaya zhurnalistika 2018. Globalnye vyzovy, regionalnoe partnerstvo i media. Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno–prakticheskoy konferencii. (Minsk, 2018): 137–142.

Koziubra, Mykola. Zahalna teoriya prava [General Theory of Law]. Kyiv: Vaite, 2015.

Ladyka, Iryna. “Pyat dumok pro postpravdu [Five Thoughts about Post-truth].” Studway. Accessed May 15, 2018. http://studway.com.ua/postpravda/.

Maclean, Ian. Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance: The Case of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Marmor, Andrei. “Truth in Law.”Accessed June 21, 2018 http://law.bepress.com/usclwpslss/art73/.

Moore, Michael S. “Interpreting Interpretation.” In Law and Interpretation. Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Andrei Marmor, 1–30. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

Nersesyanc, Vladik S. Obshchaya teoriia prava i gosudarstva [General Theory of Law and State]. Moscow: Norma, 2002.

“Reiderstvo v Ukraini—khto vynen? [Raiding in Ukraine—Who is Responsible?].” Accessed May 15, 2018. http://kiev-chamber.org.ua/uk/134/995.html.

Schiller, Arthur A, “Roman Interpretatio and Anglo-American Interpretation and Construction.” Virginia Law Review 27.6 (1941): 733–768. https://doi.org/10.2307/1067747

Shugrina, Elena S. Tekhnika yuridicheskogo pisma [Technique of Legal Drafting]. Moscow: Delo, 2000.

Yuhas, Alan. “Ukraine Crisis: an Essential Guide to What Happened.” The Guardian, April 13, 2014. Accessed May 15, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/11/ukraine-russia-crimea-sanctions-us-eu-guide-explainer.

Zvieriev, Ievgen, “The Interpretation Power of Ukrainian Constitutional Court as One of the Main Reasons of Ukrainian Crisis of 2013–2014.” Míl’niky Práva v Stredoeurópskom priestore (2014): 856–860.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27

Issue

Section

Articles