The European Union through the Eyes of Ukrainian Think Tankers: Studying EU Perceptions Post-Euromaidan
Keywords:Ukraine, European Union, civil society, think tanks, perceptions
AbstractThe European Union (EU) engagement in its Eastern neighborhood, including Ukraine, has attracted considerable scholarly attention. Yet studies focusing on EU perceptions in neighboring countries have been rare, which is especially true for EU perceptions among non-governmental actors. This article examines perceptions (or images) of the EU and its initiatives, such as the Eastern Partnership and the Association Agreement, within a specific group of Ukrainian civil society organizations, namely think tanks (as elite opinion makers), following the Euromaidan Revolution. The study maps discursive frames used by leading think tank representatives working in the field of foreign and security policy analysis or performing the functions of watchdogs in sectors such as democratization, public administration reform, and economic liberalization. Methodologically, the study employs content analysis of policy related papers published by the organizations, as well as complementary expert interviews with representatives of the Ukrainian think tank community. The article thus contributes to understanding the civil society’s views on the EU in Ukraine in the post-Euromaidan period.
Abelson, Donald E. Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. 2nd ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2009.
Arin, Kubilay Y. Think Tanks. The Brain Trusts of US Foreign Policy. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2014.
Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 611–39.
Center for Democracy and Rule of Law. Roadmap of Reforms for Ukraine, Reanimation Package of Reforms. 2016–2017. Accessed December 4, 2016. http://rpr.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/RPR-Roadmap-of-Reforms-for-Ukraine.pdf.
Chaban, Natalia, and Ole Elgström. “The Role of the EU in an Emerging World Order in the Eyes of the Chinese, Indian and Russian Press.” Journal of European Integration 36.2 (2014): 170–88.
Chaban, Natalia, Martin Holland, and Serena Kelly. “Perceptions of ‘Normative Power Europe’ in the Shadow of the Eurozone Debt Crisis: Public Perspectives on European Integration from the Asia Pacific.” In Importing EU Norms: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings. Edited by Annika Björkdahl, 57–77. United Nations University Series on Regionalism 8. Cham, s.l.: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
Civil Society Organisation. “Public Lustration Committee: Disruption of the Full Launch of E-declaring is a Demonstration of the Unwillingness of the Authorities to Fight Corruption.” News release. 2016. Accessed December 4, 2016. http://lku.org.ua/press_articles/582.
Delegation of the European Union to Ukraine. “Statement by the EU Delegation and the Embassies of EU Member States in Kyiv on the Launch of an E-declaration System Without Certification in Ukraine.” News release. August 17, 2016. Accessed December 4, 2016. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/ukraine/press_corner/all_news/news/2016/2016_08_17_en.htm.
Dostal, Vit, Nikola Karasova, and Vaclav Lidl. “Trends of Eastern Partnership.” Accessed March 27, 2017. https://www.amo.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/trends_of_eastern_partnership.pdf.
Druckman, James N. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98.4 (2004): 671–86.
Gerasymchuk, Sergiy. “Think-Tanks – the Problems of Definition and the Way to Solve Them, Think Twice UA.” Accessed March 11, 2017. http://thinktwiceua.org/wp-content/uploads/Think-tank-definition-article-SG-2.pdf.
Getmanchuk, Alyona, and Segiy Solodkyy. “A Call for the EU – Time to Step In: Ukraine’s Expectations from the European Union.” Accessed March 12, 2017. http://iwp.org.ua/img/EU_exp_01.pdf.
Hart, Paul’t, and Ariadne Vromen. “A New Era for Think Tanks in Public Policy? International Trends, Australian Realities.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 67.2 (2008): 135–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00577.x.
Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
Keukeleire, Stephan. “Lessons for the Practice and Analysis of EU Diplomacy from an ‘Outside-in’ Perspective.” In The Neighbours of the European Union’s Neighbours: Diplomatic and Geopolitical Dimensions beyond the European Neighbourhood Policy. Edited by Erwan Lannon and Sieglinde Gstöhl, 227–41. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2014.
Kostanyan, Hrant. Assessing European Neighbourhood Policy: Perspectives from the Literature. Brussels: CEPS, 2017.
2016Kucheriv, Ilko. “Whom Ukrainians Trust the Most: Government, Civil Society or Media? Public Opinion of the Citizens of Ukraine: 2010–2015. What has Changed?” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://dif.org.ua/article/komu-bilshe-doviryayut-ukraintsi-vladi-gromadskosti-zmi.
Livny, Eric. “In Search of its Voice: Assessment of Policy Relevant Research in Ukraine.” Kyiv, 2013. https://issuu.com/uniter/docs/assessment_of_policy-relevant_research_eng.
Mahmood, Ahmad. “US Think Tanks and the Politics of Expertise: Role, Value and Impact.” The Political Quarterly 79.4 (2008): 529–55.
Malyhina, Kateryna. “EU Membership Ambitions: What Alternative Approaches Exist and how is the European Foreign Policy Perceived in Ukraine?” In The EU Member States and the Eastern Neighbourhood – From Composite to Consistent EU Foreign Policy? Edited by Sebastian Schäffer and Dominik Tolksdorf. Special issue, CAP Policy Analysis 1 (2009): 24–28. Accessed March 14, 2017. http://www.cap.uni-muenchen.de/download/2009/CAP-Policy-Analysis-2009-01.pdf.
Medvetz, Thomas. Think tanks in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
Mišík, Matúš. “How Can Perception Help us to Understand the Dynamic between EU Member States? The State of the Art.” Asia Europe Journal 11.4 (2013): 445–63.
Omelicheva, Mariya Y. Democracy in Central Asia: Competing Perspectives and Alternative Strategies. Kentucky: The Kentucky University Press, 2015.
Poroshenko, Petro. “President’s Annual Message to Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: On the Internal and External Situation of Ukraine in 2015.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/shorichne-poslannya-prezidenta-ukrayini-do-verhovnoyi-radi-u-35412.
Reanimation Package of Reforms. “Our History.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://rpr.org.ua/en/about-us/history/.
Sasse, Gwendolyn. “Ukraine’s Visa Liberalization Saga.” Carnegie Europe, November 28, 2016. Accessed December 10, 2016. http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/66262.
Shiming, Fan. “Chinese Public Perceptions of Japan and the United States in the post-Cold War Era.” In Getting the Triangle Straight: Managing China-Japan-US relations. Edited by Gerald L. Curtis, Ryosei Kokobun and Jisi Wang, 269–91. Tokyo, New York, NY: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2010.
“The Coalition Agreement.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://samopomich.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Koaliciyna_uhoda_parafovana_20.11.pdf.
The Global Go To Think Tank. “2015 Index Report.” Accessed December 7, 2016. http://gotothinktank.com/2015-global-go-to-think-tank-index-report/.
Think Twice UA. “Ukraine.” Accessed November 29, 2016. http://thinktwiceua.org/en/think-tanks-en/ukraine/.
“On Public Participation in Formulation and Implementation of Public Policy.” Decree No. 996. Ukrainian Government. November 3, 2010. Accessed March 16, 2017. http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-2010-%D0%BF.
Ukrainian Think Tanks Liaison Office in Brussels. “Members.” Accessed November 29, 2016. https://ukraine-office.eu/en/members/.
“On the Program of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine.” Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. December 11, 2014. Accessed November 29, 2016. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/26-19.
Wiarda, Howard J. “The New Powerhouses: Think Tanks and Foreign Policy.” American Foreign Policy Interests 30.2 (2008): 96–117. doi:10.1080/10803920802022704.
Copyright (c) 2017 Vera Axyonova, Diana Zubko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal provides free access to original research without restriction barriers (i.e. subscription fees, licensing fees etc.).
Unless otherwise indicated, content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which means you are free to:
distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially
...provided that any use is made with attribution to author(s) and Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal.
The copyright in the article or any other submission to Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal shall remain with the author(s).
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.